 | | Re: "gutless" bush? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) Not even if they're crucified? Dave! (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: "gutless" bush? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) Thank you for bringing that moment of *perfect* clarity, Dave! I'll walk and talk peace, thanks. Dave K (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: "gutless" bush? —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) You mean *self-inflicted* crucifixion? JOHN (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "gutless" bush? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Heck, yeah! He was *the Lord* according to the myth. If he allowed it to occur, then it's tantamount to causing it to occur. Dave! (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "gutless" bush? —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) But can he create a stone he can't lift? You raise some heavy theological issues, not the least of which is circular in reasoning. JOHN (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
