 | | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble? —Dave Schuler
| | | | (...) Wow, John--this is one of those rare moments when you and I are in complete agreement (at least with the NEA part). I can think of absolutely no reason whatsoever that the government should provide public funding for artists. Having said that, (...) (22 years ago, 26-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble? —Lester Witter
| | | | | I thought that the patented part of the basic brick was the tubes Lester (22 years ago, 26-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble? —Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) Maybe a few decades ago, but not anymore. At least, not unless the patent can legally be ignored by 10+ other brands! Dave! (22 years ago, 26-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
