 | | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble? —David Koudys
| | | | (...) When I had a run-in with the legal dep't many years ago, it was because I used the name LEGO, and their logo in my movie, as well as some other names that they had trademarked. They said that if I removed the names and logos from the movie, (...) (22 years ago, 26-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble? —John Neal
| | | | | | (...) Most of BPS's scenes in the BT *aren't* MOCs, but rather pics of minifigs with talk bubbles, and some cases they are in rather offensive poses (to which, no doubt, drew the pedaphiles). The *minifig* is most definitely a trademark of TLC, and (...) (22 years ago, 26-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble? —Bruce Hietbrink
| | | | | | | (...) That assumes a particular definition of MOC. One could argue that "Take hairpiece A, put it on top of head B, on torso C, with legs D" is as much a MOC (albeit a very simple one) as "Take brick A, stick it on plate B, etc". Bruce (22 years ago, 26-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble? —John Neal
| | | | | | | (...) Good luck in court;-) JOHN (22 years ago, 26-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble? —Tobbe Arnesson
| | | | | (...) Yeah, it's not like TLC have printed "LEGO" on every stud or something... :) Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (22 years ago, 27-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
