 | | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) I had already said it was a matter of perspective. (...) I get the feeling you are being obtuse... (...) After avoiding the question a number times, you now claim the question is invalid. I'll try again; Is that, on balance, good or bad? (...) (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Alright then, I don't accept your perspective. I think it's a baseless emotional response to Larry. (...) That's another baseless accusation AND name calling. (...) There is no balance point. There is no line to cross between "good" and "bad". (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) You are entitled to that view. Do you care to justify it? (...) could (...) expect (...) me (...) the (...) at (...) .now you are being obtuse ;) (...) or (...) paper (...) not (...) Why are you trying so hard not to answer such a simple (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Ok. You said it was a matter of perspective, not definition, thereby making it your opinion. Hence, you rank the term "troll" as a qualitative value rather than a definitive one. And because of your repeated dislike of Larry, I think you held (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I fear your “lack of justification” argument against me has grown rather diffuse. Part of the problem is the lack of good evidence you have been willing to produce. The text in this post contains a quote that I said “contains a great (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: stopping topics vs. dealing with troublemakers and nonconstructive participants —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Well-- you could, but would that somehow prove that you didn't deserve it? (...) Alright then-- If that's the case, then it's my opinion that you didn't like the implication of an attack on your person which is what you read into Larry's post, (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | <snip> —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | David, I have a couple of issues with your post which I'd like to highlight before tackling the other points you raise: 1. Issue 1 (...) I'm not being clear on this one bit. In fact I've made a bit of a mess. Let's rewind[?]. Asking me to find (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
