 | | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression? —David Koudys
|
| | | (...) I was hopefully going for a stop on the debate instead of a censure of the person. One *should* cause debates on other topics to continue unfettered, the other could be, imho, perceived as an attack on the person. Whereas I agree with the (...) (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) Spectacular sentence construction there! That's what you get for writing half a sentence and then coming back to it a half hour later to 'wrap it up'. I think folks can read (...) (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I agree with your disagreement. Ignoring certain individuals often achieves a great deal, and done properly, does not result in animosity from anyone else except the miscreant, who merely need reform (or go away). (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) No doubt you would propose yourself as a role model? Scott A (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
