Subject:
|
Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 7 Dec 2002 14:24:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1798 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Bzzt!!!!! (1) Darn. You were winning, too. It's a darn shame.
>
> Well, at least the thread is over, anyway.
>
> 1 - half in jest, we subscribe to Godwin's law here:
> http://info.astrian.net/jargon/terms/g/Godwin_s_Law.html (2) ... or at least
> we say we do because it's fun...
> 2 - not the only Jargon Dictionary ref, in fact not the definitive one, just
> the first one that Google found for me.
Ah, you caught me. @8^)
I was trying to sneak out of continuing this debate. By mentioning the
H-man, I thought I could end it having still gotten in the last word(1).
Alas, not everyone recognizes Godwin's Law around here(2).
-Rev. Smith
(1) Actually, I had never heard of the law before you posted, but I have to
say: that's awesome.
(2) Including, as evidenced by this most, me.
PS. But isn't prematurely trying to shut down a debate about religion a
rather Nazi-esque tactic?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
| (...) Bzzt!!!!! (1) Darn. You were winning, too. It's a darn shame. Well, at least the thread is over, anyway. 1 - half in jest, we subscribe to Godwin's law here: (URL) (2) ... or at least we say we do because it's fun... 2 - not the only Jargon (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
205 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
