| | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea Dave Schuler
|
| | (...) Never trust a man with two first names, I always say. 8^) Dave! (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) I thought the old axiom was 'always trust a Dave!' At least, IIRC Dave K (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | | | (...) I thought the old axiom was "make sure you marry a man with two last names" (preferably old money names). :-) Maggie C. (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | (...) But if I did that, my wife would kill me. Dave! PS. By the way, I forgot "scolex" (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | | | | (...) And Spandex, Dave! How could you forget Spandex!? Maggie (22 years ago, 15-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | (...) Aw, shucks--and I thought you'd overlooked my post. How, indeed, could I ever forget Spandex? Dave! (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | | | | (...) That's okay, Dave! I didn't think of Spandex til the weekend myself! (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I'm thinking YDNRC... (22 years ago, 7-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) Well, I've never met a Dave I didn't like, so there's a personal axiom--I've never met a Dave I didn't like! No recollection needed. Though, thinking of it now, not too many Larry's I didn't like, either. But just those two... Dave K. (22 years ago, 7-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea John Neal
|
| | | | (...) You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! The most famous is never to get involved in a land war in Asia. And only slightly less well known is this: never go in against a double-named debater when truth is on the line! -John (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Wait a minute--- John? Neal? I should have known! Dave! (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea John Neal
|
| | | | | | | (...) That's right! Have you ever heard of Plato? Aristotle? Socrates? Morons! -John (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) Inconceivable!! (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea Pedro Silva
|
| | | | (...) Auch! :'( Any exceptions? Pedro (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |