 | | Re: "I am told that" "it is probable that" "at least some" American-Christians "seem" to fund the IRA? —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) Heck, I ignore Scott, but judging by the flurry of responses, he won't do me the same favor. He wants and craves attention. Ignoring him is still the best option. He'll even pick up on long-distance, unstated twitting of his hypocritical (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: "I am told that" "it is probable that" "at least some" American-Christians "seem" to fund the I —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) Thanks for your rather disruptive input, but I've no intention of joining in your mudslinging. [BTW: I'm not anti-American, I'm pro-justice - understand the difference]. (...) How ironic; I note you have chosen to sling mud rather than address (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Dealing with the problem —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Good analysis, Bruce, but it's not enough that just you ignore him, or that just I ignore him. For off-topic.debate to truly be enjoyable, it's necessary that EVERYONE ignore him, and manage to do so consistently. This is necessary because if (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Dealing with the problem —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | Larry, Take a look at the current fuss. Look at what started it. You should hang your head in shame rather that cause more fuss. It may be a cultural thing, but personally I think sniggering and name-calling is far more “anti-social” than my alleged (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
