 | | Counterscript
|
|
I ran across this linked from Penny Arcade... (URL) appears serious (but how can you tell these days). :-) or at least formatted prettily. Contrast with: (URL) (and other variants, which have been around a long time). I posted to both .fun and (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: debate fodder from an unusual source...
|
|
(...) I would imagine that both are related to the level the economy is operating at. (...) I'm not sure "Railroads" have been nationalised in the UK(?) - I exepct Tony has went the "3rd Way". (...) However you look at that mess, it is not an (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: debate fodder from an unusual source...
|
|
(...) What are the other criteria used to determine/justify these "natural monopolies?" (...) My coworker has a power line running to his house that he occasionally uses during peak use times on the weekend, but primarily generates his own power. If (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: debate fodder from an unusual source...
|
|
(...) *some* economists do. Others reject the notion of a natural monopoly. The classic example is the (...) Just as a side note, I've said in the past that I didn't buy the natural monopoly argument, and have argued in detail against specific (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: how to make points?
|
|
(...) Since that would mean that my wife has standing to comment (at about 1/8 Native American) but I (at pretty much all European) don't... I would tend to hold it as not reasonable. Else she'll hold it against ME! (23 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
