To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17674
17673  |  17675
Subject: 
Ashcroft named as top defendant in civil suit
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 15:11:10 GMT
Viewed: 
167 times
  
I found this interesting:

http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/09/13/awadallah.suit/index.html

We'll see how far it gets. I expect he'll be removed from the suit, after
all, can't have our government officials held personally liable for what
they do, now can we?



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Ashcroft named as top defendant in civil suit
 
(...) I didn't get from the article what the specific and direct role played by Ashcroft was. Is he only guilty for setting a cavalier tone within the federal law enforcement machine, or was it something more clear cut? Chris (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Ashcroft named as top defendant in civil suit
 
(...) statute: TITLE 42, CHAPTER 21, SUBCHAPTER I, Sec. 1983. Sec. 1983. - Civil action for deprivation of rights Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

4 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR