|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
> > Just about any pat rendering of morality or social expression will have a
> > flaw like this; the basic Wiccan dilemma is what if there is harm no matter
> > what action is taken?
>
> Can you come up with an example that isn't wildly contrived or overly
> concerned with the fate of bacteria or ants?
Stunningly easy:
"Jane" and "Joe" are in a relationship that is no longer working out.
Staying together is causing a fair degree of pain and stress for them;
seperating will also couse a fair degree of pain and stress. Neither action
has the option of 'harming none'.
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: slight
|
| (...) Well, I think you are stressing the word "harm" a bit here. Everyone knows it takes two to tango, but only one to stop the dance. Them's the breaks... I'll take this opportunity to quote Mr. Crowley: "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: slight
|
| (...) Can you come up with an example that isn't wildly contrived or overly concerned with the fate of bacteria or ants? -- Hop-Frog (22 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
225 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|