 | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
| (...) False. Evolution describes the changes to fit the environment (simplifying greatly). If the Ceolacanth evolved to the point *where it succeeded in its' environment*, it doesn't necessarily have to change any more to fit Evolutionary Theory. (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
| (...) In fact, the coelecanth *has* undergone further change. Genus Latimera is unknown in the fossil record; it is *a* coelecanth, but there are many, many types. A few of the changes that have happened to the coelecanth since the end of the (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
