 | | Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. —Dave Schuler
| | | | (...) Right to whom? To yourself? That's mighty solipsistic of a professed Xtian. Regardless, Pascal's wager is no validation of faith whatsoever, unless one already believes and feels like he needs a reason to continue. (...) Well, quacks are (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. —David Koudys
| | | | | | (...) K, I was replying to someone who mentinoed that perhaps there is no God and that I'm wasting my time being a Christian. My answer, slightly tongue-in-cheek, was stating that 'so what?' If I get to the end of my life, living as a Christian and (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) Correct. The "Big AMA Conspiracy" *actually* in effect is the one that restricts the supply of doctors in order to drive up the price of medical services. Classic cartel/union operation. (22 years ago, 8-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
