Subject:
|
Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 6 Jan 2002 08:40:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1150 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Inosanto writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jeff Stembel writes:
> > You see another option? Either ban them or not, there isn't much middle
> > ground on the issue. Jon feels the community as a whole would be better
> > served if these types of images were banned.
> >
> > Jeff
>
> Why? Because he does not like them?
He is well within his rights to ask for a ban on something he dislikes. Unlike
many calls-for-bans, however, he actually has valid points.
> Why should these lego items be banned from a lego pic hosting service? Are
> they lego related - yes!
Well, because they are barely related, and certainly don't add anything to the
community; in Jon's opinion at least. Would a fully nude person wearing Lego
earrings or a lego hat be acceptable material for Brickshelf? It would be Lego
related, afterall.
> He simply wants them banned because *he* does not like them!
And he is well within his right to do so. Anyway, all he wants to know right
now is if anyone agrees with him. Afterall, isn't that how all petitions and
protests start? Are you saying they were all wrong?
> Is that mature?
Yes. He posted politely, looking for agreement, and he stated his opinions
honestly. If you feel this is immature, you need to get reacquainted with the
definition.
> And as far as other options for this - there is one - IGNORE THEM! Is that
> really hard to do? Really, is it?
Is that really an option? Do you ask the person who gets 40 spam emails a day
to ignore them? What about twenty telemarketer phone calls a night? These are
hard to ignore because they are disruptive; as Jon apparently feels these
images are. Afterall, on any given check of the Recent page, over half of what
shows up seems to be these "avatars" or similar images.
Jeff
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
| (...) That is your right to think he has valid points, but that is not the point. (...) No, because children would see it - your example is a very poor one. These are as lego-related as the cad images. AFAIK there is not a way to do this in mclad or (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
122 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
