Debate : 15224


Off-Topic / Debate / 15224	15223 \| 15225

Subject:	Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Sat, 22 Dec 2001 12:42:32 GMT
Viewed:	1348 times

In lugnet.mediawatch, Larry Pieniazek writes: > are you suggesting that the Brick Testament ought not to be > viewed by children? I almost would. > *IT* uses LEGO as the medium of expression and *IT* has > sex in it, after all. And not just wholesome (to most people) missionary > style between married but otherwise unreleated people sex, but nasty (to > most) sex with rape and incest in it. The rape and non sex violence is more a problem than the sex. I mean, sex is just sex. > they are 9 and 12. That topic ought not to come up with a 3 year old other Hunh? Why the heck not? Chris

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
(...) I said why. 3 is in my view too young to get into the anatomical details of how exactly gay love works. Or straight love for that matter. It's frankly, likely to be boring to the 3 year old anyway and not particularly relevant. But the part (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
In lugnet.mediawatch, John Neal writes: <snip> I'm having a hard time reconciling "Jason Rowoldt" and "merely another slimeball" as phrases that belong in the same post, frankly. Jason has done a great deal of good for the hobby with his efforts, (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search