To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 15202
15201  |  15203
Subject: 
Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 18:03:47 GMT
Viewed: 
1132 times
  
I didn't bother to watch.

Violence much be eshewed as well, but there is a fine
line WRT teaching children about good and evil.  There is no such line when it
comes to the topic of sex and children.  The very definition of a child is one
who hasn't knowledge of such things, and presenting it to them forces their
childhood from them, which is, in my mind, evil.

Interesting definition of childhood-- I think I agree with the definition...
However, I'm not sure I see it as evil if one attempted to 'force' adult
information on them.

Innocence, once lost, is gone forever.  Experience comes with age.  When
experience comes before age (childhood), healthy development is almost certainly
impossible.  Anyone who would rob a child of the chance to develop normally into
a mature, healthy adult... yeah, I'd call them (or their acts) evil.


I suppose at John's response you would question what it means to "develop
normally" and what it means to be a "mature healthy adult."

I want to throw my name in with those who believe there is a difference
between good and evil.  I would challenge you to tell me when rape and child
molestation could ever be considered good (or at least, not evil).  I pity
the person whose moral values are so open-minded that they're empty minded.
If that's you, please, please don't have children.  And please stay away
from mine.

Markus
who believes moral relativism is cowardly and irresponsible.  Though I guess
you'd question my definition on those things too.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) From my particular standpoint, it would only be morally good when the person doing it honestly believed they were doing good. However, it doesn't mean that the person shouldn't be stopped-- nor that one would be morally wrong to try and stop (...) (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
(...) Of course. Sometimew it is *unavoidable* Please provide an acceptable solution to stopping the moral dilemma of the Nazi tyranny in WWII without violence. (...) Disagree. I think good and evil can be distinguished IRL. Sometimes it's harder (...) (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR