 | | Re: All important (was: Amtrak Told to Plan Liquidation) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Sorry if this is a repost. I lost my cookies somewhere. Anywho... I don't think we got to closure on this (or much of anything else, lately) so don't be sorry. I am not sure I follow this argument. You are going to have to elaborate. I will (...) (23 years ago, 10-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: All important (was: Amtrak Told to Plan Liquidation) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) to (...) When I lose mine, I generally find them a couple of months later, all mashed up down the back of the couch 8?) (...) And buildings exist for the convenience of companies to house their workers. They're not necessary, but they're (...) (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: All important (was: Amtrak Told to Plan Liquidation) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Maybe I'm still not following you here, but I would tend to say yes, the things that are a RESULT of the building's existance ought to be borne by the building users (...) This doesn't follow. Just because some fair thing is hard to do is not (...) (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: All important (was: Amtrak Told to Plan Liquidation) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) Not sure here, but are you implying that the existance of the WTC buildings was less to blame for Sep 11 than the existance of the aeroplanes? (...) for (...) If you come to us & say "This polution can only affect you 8 people, and I want you (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: All important (was: Amtrak Told to Plan Liquidation) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) I think that a security company would typically charge a fee for their services. And their services could include defense against missile attack. So it's just a matter of people feeling properly motivated. Some people are willing to work in (...) (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: All important (was: Amtrak Told to Plan Liquidation) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) I'm *happy* for airlines (and building managers, whoever) to pay for extra security *if they choose to*. I'm *happy* to pay an extra fee to increase my safety when I fly. I should, however, be able to choose. (...) for (...) planning (...) OK. (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: All important (was: Amtrak Told to Plan Liquidation) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Uh...sorry. It seems that we're in essentially complete agreement. I must have misunderstood your points...or they changed...or something. Chris (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
