Subject:
|
Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 16:10:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
559 times
|
| |
|
|
> How so? I would like a little more clarity on this charge. What makes them
> racist?
>
> > they ARE occupying Palestine, they ARE killing the native people,
> > so what's to support? Why do you keep defending Israel? Can't you tell wrong
> > from right, who's the aggressor and who's the victim?
>
> You are correct. I cannot tell wrong from right in this case. That's the
> point Richard M makes as well and he's right. I cannot tell who is the
> aggressor and who is the victim. Both sides are aggressors, both sides are
> victims.
But you did once say one side was “far worse”. You never retracted that
comment, but you never justified it either. As far as I can remember?
>
> You accuse me of "supporting Israel". But all I do is point out the bad on
> one side to balance you.
I hear what you are saying Larry, but I'm sure to most people it does look
like you defend Israel. You certainly very rarely agree with anyone who
criticises them. Then again, perhaps you are more anti-Palestine than
pro-Israel? You have certainly made you view on Islam known.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
|
| (...) Sarcastically. (1) That's distortive because you snipped the cite. At the same time you were composing your post accusing me of being closed minded, I was composing a post acknowledging a serious hole in the argument I advanced. That's not the (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
