| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > bin Laden, or the media, are welcome to buy pictures of this resolution
> > > elsewhere, if they can obtain them. Nothing is stopping them, it's a free
> > > market with no legal barriers to entry.
> >
> > Maybe we'll even sell them to him :) Of course the price may be
> > non-monetary! And of course, no guarantees on picture quality, either :)
>
> Here's a hypothetical: what if some company sells bin Laden et al bogus
> but real-seeming photos giving false information? What if, afterward, bin
> Laden would seek damages from the company for its deceptive product?
The result of course would be that I wouldn't want the judge's job, nor any
part in the jury :)
Honestly, I think it would depend on the company's honest intent, the
ability to prove that intent, the measurment of the damages resulting to bin
Laden, and above all, the country in which the suit took place...
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: censoring
|
| (...) Here's a hypothetical: what if some company sells bin Laden et al bogus but real-seeming photos giving false information? What if, afterward, bin Laden would seek damages from the company for its deceptive product? Dave! (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
117 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
