Subject:
|
Re: A N T H R A X - they aren't making this stuff in caves in Afghanistan
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Oct 2001 22:10:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
745 times
|
| |
| |
Mr L F Braun wrote:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > (citing the Guardian)
> > > ==+==
> > > In May 1989, large-scale anthrax production began at a factory constructed
> > > at Al Hakam. Unscom estimated that Al Hakam manufactured 8,425 litres of
> > > anthrax bacteria during the course of 1990.
> > > ==+==
> >
> > Thanks for the cite. Does anyone know if this stuff keeps for 10 years in
> > powder form? Bacteria are quite resilient but 10 years is an aw'fly long time.
>
> The powder isn't bacteria. The powder is *spores*. And spores
> keep a long, long, long time--live spores nearly 8,000 years old
> have been pulled from ice cores in the last decade or so.
At a California university researchers have uncovered living bacteria
spores (encased in amber?) up to 135 millions years old. Incredible.
-chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
117 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|