Subject:
|
Re: We are letting the terrorists win
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 Oct 2001 00:32:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
157 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Simpson writes:
> >
> > I will be getting on planes this Autumn - several of them. But I admit to • being
> > a little bit nervous flying out of Baltimore.
>
> Interesting a lot of people are nervous (understandably) about flying in
> planes, but no-ones mentioned other mass-transit (buses, trains) which could be
> used with fair efficiency (even if maybe not quite so spectacular) for similar
> terrorist tasks. Has there been talk of enhanced security for bus & train
> travel?
Probably should be. See this article which makes the point that if anything,
trains/buses are MORE vulnerable since you don't just have terminals and key
points to protect, you have miles and miles and miles of track (or road) and
there is a long history of very low tech sabotage of track going back as far
as the US Civil War. (or farther??)
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-nadler101101.shtml
It also makes the point that rail subsidies in the US fail spectacularly
since they are spectacularly non-market-driven.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: We are letting the terrorists win
|
| (...) being (...) Interesting a lot of people are nervous (understandably) about flying in planes, but no-ones mentioned other mass-transit (buses, trains) which could be used with fair efficiency (even if maybe not quite so spectacular) for similar (...) (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
