Subject:
|
Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:28:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
688 times
|
| |
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GKzyrx.D4z@lugnet.com...
>
> Heck, I'd even accept the outcome of a poll with these three choices:
>
> - Ban Scott from .debate, he is low value add and annoying
> - Ban Larry from .debate, he is low value add and annoying
> - Ban neither of them, they're both fine enough
>
> (although I won't accept "ban both", sorry, it's me OR you that has to go)
>
> with votes restricted to those who have posted to this forum in the last two
> years that choose to vote.
>
>
What about a fight to the death?
Via webcam of course.
Or better still
Ban lugnet.off-topic.debate, so we can get back to discussing Lego.
regards
lawrence
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered
|
| (...) The argument has been made in the past that having .debate as a place to send off topic debates is good for the rest of LUGNET. If you want to discuss LEGO, do so. Nothing is stopping you, nothing is making you post here, and posts here do not (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | ScottFroth(tm) answered
|
| (...) My basis for "not being convinced that we didn't get snookered" is lingering doubt that maybe, just maybe, bin Laden actually *was* the owner or part owner of that plant through some twisted chain, whether or not it was completely harmless or (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
