To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13422
13421  |  13423
Subject: 
Re: War
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:30:00 GMT
Viewed: 
737 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:

Such sweeping assumptions on causality. Tsk tsk.

Tsk tsk yourself. I'm comfortable I've got the causes pegged correctly.

http://www.nationalreview.com/15oct01/jos101501.shtml

?
That doesn't touch the basic premise of my point. Perhaps I should point out
that fault != bad. Saying that the US isn't at fault is erroneous. Saying
that you stand behind our actions insofar as you think things would have
been *WORSE* had we acted differently or not at all is what I expect you to
mean. Per your example, I expect that you think that the one who could have
acted *BETTER* was FB Sr.-- NOT the state that imprisons him. But I would
not expect one to say "the state is not at fault".

Perhaps I would be so persnickity as to point out at such an admission that
it might be possible for the state to act *slightly* better, but not so much
better as to allow a situation in which little FB gets his Xbox. I.E. the
"bad" part of the fault lies even MORESO on FB Sr. percentagewise than the
whole part of the fault.

DaveE

Nope. That cite in fact does get to the root of the assertion you make.
Saying that FB Sr. has an out because he had a bad childhood is egregious
bogosity.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: War
 
(...) An "out"? I never said he had an "out". An "out" implies removal of responsibility perhaps, but not of fault. Perhaps a re-reading of my two posts is in order. I feel a little like I'm entering the "Scott-and-Larry show" on this one... DaveE (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: War
 
(...) that fault != bad. Saying that the US isn't at fault is erroneous. Saying that you stand behind our actions insofar as you think things would have been *WORSE* had we acted differently or not at all is what I expect you to mean. Per your (...) (23 years ago, 4-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

177 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR