| |
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:GK3Mz9.90A@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > I hope it is a gross exaggeration, but I heard last night that the • sanctions
> > in Iraq had killed 500,000 in total.
>
> Both you and Dan have bandied this number about before. Here's a piece • that
> tries to debunk it. It is a good piece for several other reasons, IMHO.
>
> Is the author correct that this statistic is a sham?
>
>
http://www.dailytelegraph.co.uk/dt?ac=006068940062214&rtmo=qKxJMMX9&atmo=ggg
ggggK&pg=/01/9/23/dl01.html
Daily Telegraph = Right Wing Rag. I prefer independent news:
http://news6.thdo.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/newsid_35000/35065.stm
Scott A
>
> (the part about Iraqi children is several paragraphs in)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: War
|
| (...) all, since you have nothing to contribute. Doubt I'll get my wish though. Do you have any fact based debunking or is your entire critique a slur of the source with nothing else behind it? (23 years ago, 27-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: War
|
| "Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:GKB7Hq.1wt@lugnet.com... (...) LOL Surely BBC=Left Wing Rag? regards lawrence (23 years ago, 27-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: War
|
| (...) Both you and Dan have bandied this number about before. Here's a piece that tries to debunk it. It is a good piece for several other reasons, IMHO. Is the author correct that this statistic is a sham? (URL) part about Iraqi children is several (...) (23 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
177 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
