Subject:
|
Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:45:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
588 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> >
> > > The police could not move in on Randy whats-his-name for weeks/months as
> > > there were children were there - that is why they held off. Likewise with
> > > Waco, if no children were there, I think the "Feds" would have moved much
> > > sooner. Just like Saddam, both these groups used kids to protect their
> > > position.
> >
> > You're raving. The Weavers didn't hold off the agents for any real time, and
> > at Mt.Carmel, they didn't storm the Branch Davidians because they didn't want
> > to die. If your logic were correct, then why did they decide to assault the
> > Weavers when kids were present and why didn't they assault the Branch >Davidians
> > as soon as the kids were clear?
> >
> > Your claim that they were using the children as human shields is the same as
> > claiming that _I_ am doing so because I have a child in my house too. That's
> > nuts.
> >
> > Chris
>
> Scott is working on perfecting the Big Lie. Repeat an untruth enough times
> and people tend to accept it as true.
So who told you your version of the Truth?
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
182 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
