Subject:
|
Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 22:58:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
477 times
|
| |
|
|
GB doesn't count - they don't HAVE the massive amount of guns already easily
available on the primary new and secondary new/used market.
Two TOTALLY different bases to start from.
Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
>
> > And I suppose you think the people committing premeditated crimes own those guns
> > legally? And banning handguns would keep them from owning them?
> >
> > You're not really that naive, are you?
>
> All those poor naive people in Great Britain....
> :-)
>
> Bruce
--
| Tom Stangl, iPlanet Web Server Technical Support
| Netscape Communications Corp
| A division of AOL Time Warner
| iPlanet Support - http://www.iplanet.com/support/
| Please do not associate my personal views with my employer
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| (...) A fair enough analysis, but I don't feel it provides a good excuse in the long run. The example is there (i.e. the notion is not naive), the rest is a matter of logisitics (though a monstrously sizeable one, as you note). But then again, (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
182 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
