Subject:
|
Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:21:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
430 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> "Jason J. Railton" wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kirby Warden writes:
> > > Sure, there's a risk, and children certainly die, but how many children die
> > > in car accidents, I wonder...is anyone advocating the banning of motor
> > > vehicles...?
> >
> > Generally, it's considered quite hard to carry a concealed automobile into a
> > public building for the purposes of committing a crime.
>
> And I suppose you think the people committing premeditated crimes own those guns
> legally? And banning handguns would keep them from owning them?
>
> You're not really that naive, are you?
And how many illegally held guns were at one point were in the hands of Joe
Public legally? How many were obtained due to poor storage on the part of
Joe Public (eg under the bed/pillow)?
Scott A
>
>
>
> > This is further
> > complicated by the typical size of vehicle that seems to be favoured by the
> > American market.
>
> No, that's by soccer moms and yuppies. I'd like nothing better than to own a
> sub-micro screamer, but there's no WAY they'd pass current safety tests, and I'd
> be afraid to drive it on the road with the other cars being twice the size.
>
>
>
> > Of course, one must also reach a certain age and undergo education and
> > testing in the use of a motor car, to ensure the proper level of responsible
> > handling. Controlling one whilst drunk or otherwise impaired constitutes an
> > offence, as does allowing one to be used by minors. Can the same be said of
> > guns?
>
> It depends on the state. Some require training (or will require it soon) in
> order to own a handgun (but not a rifle or shotgun - how stupid is that? It
> should be training for all, or no training for all).
>
>
> --
> Tom Stangl
> ***http://www.vfaq.com/
> ***DSM Visual FAQ home
> ***http://ba.dsm.org/
> ***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| (...) Probably too many, but you handle that by making the punishment for losing track of a gun tougher, you don't ban guns when there are already millions out there. -- | Tom Stangl, iPlanet Web Server Technical Support | Netscape Communications (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| (...) And I suppose you think the people committing premeditated crimes own those guns legally? And banning handguns would keep them from owning them? You're not really that naive, are you? (...) No, that's by soccer moms and yuppies. I'd like (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
182 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
