 | | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon —Rick Clark
|
| | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kirby Warden writes (in part): (...) I'll come out on this one. I love the film, Capricorn One [1]. I believe the hoax theory is plausible [2], and I even doubted the veracity of the moon landing for a few days a couple (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon —Kirby Warden
|
| | | | | heh, I enjoyed watching "capricorn one". I hope no one is taking this thread as direct challenge. Though I am a believer in the moon landings, I understand that it is possible (though unlikely) that I could have been led astray. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Anniversary of a hoax? (was Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon) —Steve Chapple
|
| | | | (...) I had never questioned it before some friends pointed out the problems - now I'm leaning more to the skeptic side. I see the biggest problem being the radiation. Could you point me to your "anomaly refutation" site? At the moment the only (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Anniversary of a hoax? (was Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Chances are the anomalies you refer to are the ones pointed out in the Fox special awhile back-- I think they covered most of the bases, including the Van Allen radiation belts-- This link covered it pretty well, along with some pointers to (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Anniversary of a hoax? (was Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon) —Steve Chapple
|
| | | | (...) SRC L#765 (URL) (23 years ago, 9-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
