 | | Re: Validity testing (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?) —Scott Arthur
| | | | (...) The fact we do eat cows, chickens & fish and not humans, dolphins & chimps is more to do with social taboos that it is our morals. A dog is no more self aware than a cow in my opinion - but I don't see them on the menu (near me). Pigs are one (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Validity testing (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?) —Duane Hess
| | | | | | (...) As far as I know, pigs are not self aware either. The only animals I know of that have been "scientifically" classified as self-aware are humans, dolphins and a couple species of great ape. Is there a correlation between intelligence and (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Validity testing (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?) —David Eaton
| | | | | (...) While I agree that that *is* true in practice, the reason *behind* those social taboos *is* a moral reason, I think. So while it actually does violate *both* our morality *and* a social taboo, the actual reason behind it is purely moral, I (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
