Subject:
|
Re: Validity testing (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Jul 2001 13:44:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1139 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes:
> Following that statement, would you also conclude that "might makes right?"
No, because I don't know of *any* boundary conditions where it would hold,
contrasted with the many boundary conditions where "don't yell at your kids"
is invalid, and the few boundary conditions where "free speech" is invalid.
(to your example, I've already said I don't hold with eating dolphins. Cows,
on the other hand, have had all characteristics that might make them self
aware enough to even discuss rights bred out of them and I have no problem
whatever in seeing them raised for the slaughter. I had a great steak
yesterday... right off my grill.)
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
244 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
