To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 1129
1128  |  1130
Subject: 
Re: constitutional discussion (was:Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 2 Jun 1999 21:37:51 GMT
Viewed: 
788 times
  
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 19:21:06 GMT, Christopher L. Weeks uttered the following
profundities...
Where is slavery justified or supported, and the slaves' lack of rights?

By the commonly held idea that the slaves weren't people.  Our
constitution doesn't give those rights to horses either.


But horses are non-humanoid quadrapeds, and slaves were in
fact bipedal humanoid. The only difference between slaves and
non-slaves were skin kerotin levels.

Your analogy evoked some quite humorous imagery, such as
horses riding the jockeys at the races....
--
_____________________________________________________________
richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net remove nospam.(lugnet excepted)
Web Site:   http://freespace.virgin.net/richard.dee/lego.html
ICQ 13177071                  AOL Instant Messenger: RJD88888
_____________________________________________________________
For the best Lego news, visit:    http://www.lugnet.com/news/
Need instructions for a model?       http://www.kl.net/scans/
_____________________________________________________________



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: constitutional discussion (was:Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
 
(...) I agree that the distinction was foolish, and it was clear that some (Jefferson possibly) slave owners purposfully deluded themselves because they had it so good with slaves. nontheless, I think that is the explanation of why slaves didn't (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  constitutional discussion (was:Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
 
(...) I think it's a pretty strong corner-stone for our nation. It may need to be altered as time marches on...I just don't see a burning need. Actually, I would like to see the ammendments that pass the rights and duties which aren't specifically (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR