Subject:
|
Re: Is this sexism?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:15:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
332 times
|
| |
|
|
This is a non-issue if we pay workers for the work they do - not the time
they spend at work. If we don't do this (it is not always possible), but
give women 10% of the time off work, then it makes employers (esp. small
ones) less likely to employ women.
I think in France many employers expect employees to work a flexible working
year (1800 hours I think). This would also solve your *problem*.
Personally, I work with a great deal of females (~50%) and I have never
noticed this as being a problem.
Scott A
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Shiri Dori writes:
> I'll try not to make this a long ramble, but a short and to-the-point
> suggestion, and a few questions.
>
>
> I think that companies should give women a day (possibly two) sick days off
> per month to deal with the physical symptoms of their menstrual cycle. These
> days would not be transferable from month to month (what's not used gets
> lost) so that it's not possible to gain a long vacation for someone who
> doesn't suffer from physical symptoms, and never uses those days.
>
> While not all women get "hit badly" by their periods, many do. I personally
> find it incredibely hard to function when my stomach is flip-flopping, or
> alternatively when I'm drugged w/pain-killers, and I know I'm not the only
> one. I think the world would be a better place if women had the hardest
> day(s) of their period off - they would feel better resting in bed, their
> peers wouldn't have to suffer dealing with someone who's not in her best
> mood (1). Since the production level if someone is not feeling well is down
> to the pits, it would not be a great loss of resources to the company, yet
> working there would become worlds more attractive for women (2), possibly
> driving down salaries and gaining a better worker pool.
>
> So, that's my statement, now my questions:
>
> Is this suggestion sexist to the core? Is it really true that men and women
> are equal in everything? In that case, why should women get extra "perks"?
> Is that unfair to men? If implemented, would this give women an advantage,
> or perhaps just lessen nature's disadvantage? Is it really open to abuse or
> does it sound reasonable?
>
> Interested to hear your opinion.
>
> -Shiri
>
>
> (1) I'm not talking PMS alleged symptoms, but the natural reaction that
> someone has when they're not feeling well!
>
> (2) And possibly men, since they all try to veer clear away from us during
> "that time of month".
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Is this sexism?
|
| I'll try not to make this a long ramble, but a short and to-the-point suggestion, and a few questions. I think that companies should give women a day (possibly two) sick days off per month to deal with the physical symptoms of their menstrual cycle. (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
244 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
