Subject:
|
Re: boulders on shoulders
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:40:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
96 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.test, Duane Hess writes:
> As I interpreted it, and mind you it could be a case of snippage, she was
> responding to "A failing on minorities and women to understand the
> Libertarian message?". She seemed to be pointing out that she is a woman and
> does get the message. It just so happens that she has other things taking
> priority over an active role in the LP, some of them being sexual bias which
> is still common in todays American society.
As demonstrated by the +/- 300,000 votes the LP has typically garnered in
presidential elections, many people apparently place the LP at a lower
priority than other matters!
In any case, Bruce's point, if I may be so bold, was not to assert that
women "don't get" the Libertarian message--he was asking why women and
minorities don't participate in the LP en masse, and he was asking
ironically if it's because women and minorities "don't get" it. The
implication is not that the LP message not hard for women and minorities to
"get", but rather that women and minorities *do* get it, and don't buy it.
Am I close to the mark, Bruce?
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: boulders on shoulders
|
| (...) You are correct - it's like the rest of the quote, even when I point it out, is invisible. Dang. Anyway, yes, I am of the opinion that women and minorities *do* get the message and don't buy it. But I was trying to leave it open at the time to (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
