 | | Re: The Libertarian National Socialist Green Party (was Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) These ones: From (URL) Libertarian National Socialist Green Party is in part based upon the work of the Libertarian party from whom we gain appreciation for the individual spirit and independence from a morally-judgmental, active government. (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Libertarian National Socialist Green Party (was Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) If these guys are Libertarians, then Tony Blair ought to be running for the chair of the Tories. Putting a word in your name doesn't make you that word. (...) If these guys are Greens, then Robert Byrd ought to be stumping for the presidential (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Libertarian National Socialist Green Party (was Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) lol. If you understood UK politics you would know you have just shot yourself in the foot. (...) You are not reading the text I quoted. Think a little deeper Larry. From their platform: (URL) autonomy to the citizen Revert to authority of (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The Libertarian National Socialist Green Party (was Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)) —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | And how does this in ANY way make the Libertarian Party like the LNSGP? Taking a splinter group (hell, I wouldn't even call this a splinter group of the LP) and making the assumption that the main party is like the splinter group is so colossally (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
