Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:48:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
866 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > >
> > > > What percentage of your libertarian party is coloured?
> > >
> > > 100%
> >
> > Avoiding the question I think.
>
> Yes and no. "Coloured" (sic: colored <g>) is a really poor term that isn't
> particularly used in America. It carries the implication that europeans are
> "normal" and others are not. In the sense Larry meant it, I agree.
Thanks for the pointer.
Scott A
>
> But in the sense that you meant it, precious few. I have noted several
> times (and specifically within this string) that the overwhelming majority
> of Libertarians are white males - I have met several hundred people who have
> identified themselves as Libertarians and they have been 100% white males,
> though there are undoubtedly some that are not. When you consider the vast
> diversity of ethnicity in SoCal, that's a telling statement.
>
> Bruce
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Yes and no. "Coloured" (sic: colored <g>) is a really poor term that isn't particularly used in America. It carries the implication that europeans are "normal" and others are not. In the sense Larry meant it, I agree. But in the sense that you (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
