Subject:
|
Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 May 2001 17:31:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2413 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > >
> > > > Indeed. One normally hopes the police are impartial. World policing is more
> > > > of a protection racket.
> > >
> > > It is good to see you agreeing with the libertarians on some things.
> >
> > Yes, but I do NOT agree with being quoted out of context.
>
> So anytime I quote you, I must quote every utterance to ever come from your
> lips?
Did I say that - No. Do I want that - No.
> Get real.
I am very real.
Scott A
>
> > >
> > > > What makes you think your country would only help the good guys? Has our
> > > > countries not a history of helping the bad guys?
> > >
> > > If we were preventing missiles from impacting, regardless of the nation that
> > > was being helped, we would be helping the people -- they are mostly good • guys.
> >
> > Perhaps the bad guys can pay to protect their people against the impacting
> > missiles of the US & their friends?
>
> I would be in favor that arrangement under certain circumstances. It does seem
> a bit too close to profiteering on death for normal comfort though.
>
> Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
246 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
