Debate : 10470


Off-Topic / Debate / 10470	10469 \| 10471

Subject:	Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 14 May 2001 13:29:02 GMT
Viewed:	882 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: > Indeed. One normally hopes the police are impartial. World policing is more > of a protection racket. It is good to see you agreeing with the libertarians on some things. > What makes you think your country would only help the good guys? Has our > countries not a history of helping the bad guys? If we were preventing missiles from impacting, regardless of the nation that was being helped, we would be helping the people -- they are mostly good guys. Chris

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
(...) Yes, but I do NOT agree with being quoted out of context. (...) Perhaps the bad guys can pay to protect their people against the impacting missiles of the US & their friends? Scott A (24 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
(...) I asked a vailid one here: (URL)(although it was posed in his own inimitably (...) Ah. That would be because I questioned YOU... and you never like that. (...) That is not very libertarian? I thought the libertarian philosophy was "me! me! (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

246 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search