To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 1009
1008  |  1010
Subject: 
Re: New Web Page
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 21 May 1999 15:35:32 GMT
Viewed: 
2050 times
  
Christopher L. Weeks wrote:

> > > >    were kept in reserve at artillery parks or armories,
> > > >    just as they are today, and issued to the militia
> > > >    at the time of mobilization.  Had the right to bear
> > > 
> > > And those militia were controlled/directed by locals rather than a
> > > central autonomous well organized institution with instantaneous
> > > communications.
> > 
> >    True.  But isn't the National Guard also atomized by
> >   state except in event of a national call-up?  I consider
> >    that a "militia."
> 
> Wasn't it more of a county-sized operation?  A state - even those little
> NE states were a big area to command without electronic communication.
> If someone in my community - someone that I could get an appointment to
> see - had control of the big guns and was an equal decision maker with a
> bunch of other county military reps, I would be more comfortable.  But,
> I would still suggest that I have the right to arms as guarenteed by the second.

The Massachusetts militia were organized by towns. I think under an
elected officer. The towns of course were (and still are) governed by
open town meeting (total democracy).I don't recall how a leader was
chosen when the militia of several towns gathered in Concord.

The Concord MA millitia is now a semi-private organization, and owns a
couple cannon (which I think would still be capable of firing a
cannonball...)


--
Frank Filz

-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New Web Page
 
(...) "The people" - then and now - are whatever people we assume the constatution governs. That has clearly changed. I don't have answers to the fine points (e.g. are illegal aliens part of the people?) but I think that we can comfortably agree (...) (27 years ago, 21-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR