|  | 
 |  |  | Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts 
 | 
 |  | (...) What he said. :-/ Thanks, Franklin    (25 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate) 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts 
 | 
 |  | (...) At some level, you are correct, but there are definitely areas where you can run afoul of he law: - patents. There isn't any "fair use" type of clause for them - if you take a picture of your copy of someone else's MOC, and publish it, you may (...)   (25 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate) 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1 
 | 
 |  | Scott A wrote in message ... (...) stay (...) could (...) It used to be that students got grants to go to uni in the UK, but I thought that now (I have been away for nearly 20 years, so I'm going by what I hear from family still living there) that's (...)   (25 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate) 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts 
 | 
 |  | (...) Nope, that's not what I'm saying at all. I'm probably not being clear enough. To mirror your analogy, I'm saying that as long as I credit the band who wrote the song, and don't try to sell or republish the song, I can sing the song myself, as (...)   (25 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate) 
 |  |  |  |  |  | Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts 
 | 
 |  | (...) (oops, missed a bit here, someone _else's_ CD that you are copying, not your own copy...here, at least, it is perfectly legal to make multi copies of a CD you own, but not any copies of one a friend of yours owns...) James Powell    (25 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate) 
 |  
 |