To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *28511 (-20)
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
I forgot to add Thank you Janey, and thank you Rosco, for all the work you put in to give us a sand pit in the sun. If something else eventually gets off the ground, I hope you 2 and all the other who helped make it a grand place come back into the (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
(...) Nice work, CM Worker! (Or should I say CL Worker?) Hopefully, my prompt registering will result in a low member number (not than numbers mean anything). Spotlighted. Thanks for sharing. Cheers Richie Dulin Future JLUG2 Community Overlooker (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
(...) that would of been :wiz: (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
(...) Goodonya Leigh. Who knows what you could achieve in an hour. At this rate, we'll have ITC by the end of the week. (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
(...) I feel your pain. Today our community became slightly less warm, and slightly less embracing. But JLUG was a tour de force to be reckoned with, while it lasted. It rawked. Cheers Richie Dulin Former Unofficial JLUG CTOP List Administrator (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
(...) Yeah, like it's so hard. (URL) is just a sample, and I've only put 15 minutes work into it. worker201 (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX) ! 
 
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
It is a sad day today, I really enjoyed relaxing in Jlug, not needing to worry about watching what I or other would say. to be able to post irrelivant topics about nothing at all, or just smacking each other silly. for old times sake :wiz: :'( (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
(...) We could form a committee to discuss it, and then all resign in a fit of petulance. That'd be fun. They could run the server from a handcranked laptop in Africa. It'd probably be more reliable than those shonky Northstar servers. (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
(...) Doesn't seem fair, does it? It was one of the good ones. (...) I feel much the same way. I was contemplating setting up a website called save.JLUG.com, to provide a forum in which fans of JLUG could work to save JLUG. We could have provided (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
(...) Nooo...ooo! :-( (big sigh) Even though I never post on the site. I did lurk on the site a quite few times every week. I am bummed that the site...has let's say...is taking a LONG vacation or in other words... in a coma. There is a movie title (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
(...) Didn't you guys keep back-ups? I gotta say I'm pretty upset by this news - it's as shocking as it is unexpected. I feel like I've lost a dear friend. (...) From my perspective, I think it was enough fun, but I expect I wasn't on the receiving (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
(...) And it died before ITC could be implemented. <Single tear>. I hope the much loved JLUG statistics can be published somewhere for posterity. Cheers Richie Dulin Former JLUG Community Overlooker. (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
(...) I just can't stop crying. Where do I go to curse and post bondage vigs now? I even took a picture of a couple cranes, a Halal Pepsi can, and a robotic cat to share with everyone... (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
(...) Thanks Janey, and Ross too- it was a blast. See you 'round. (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote: snip (...) Janey, Thank you for all the effort you and ross put into JLUG. It will be missed. You ran a fine site, and stuck to your values. thank you. Chris (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
 
Here are a few new JLUG slogans.... JLUG - The end of an error.... errr I mean era. JLUG - Been there, done that, cant be bothered to do it again. JLUG - The "sandbox" is condemned. Sadly during the recent crash we (JLUG) got hit pretty hard. Our (...) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate) !! 
 
  Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
 
(...) Yeah, but if the percentage of people who posed an immediate risk to people other than themselves was significantly higher, there would be more political capital to do something about it. Once the public perceives a lack of risk to themselves, (...) (17 years ago, 11-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
 
(...) The Judeo-Christian heritage of the United States government says that it's wrong to kill anyone, therefore it should be illegal. That does, of course, lead to the obvious question of why they thought it should be a capital crime. I mean, as I (...) (17 years ago, 11-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: A shot in the dark
 
(...) I agree with most of what you have said, however I'm not certain your car analogy is valid. While cars can be a deadly weapon that is not what they are designd for. A well used gun is one that is never used whereas a well used car is used all (...) (17 years ago, 11-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: A shot in the dark
 
(...) I will agree that the homeowner was wrong, but on different grounds. He did not properly identify his target before firing. In many states, you are allowed to presume that any un-invited intruder in your house is a deadly threat. Such laws are (...) (17 years ago, 11-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR