|
 | | Withdrawing
|
| The debate that I began seems to be drawing to somewhat of a conclussion. I've made my points, then clarified them, then defended them. It is unfortunate that some still think I have some ulterior motive to the whole debate, however, I am not a (...) (24 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |  | | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| (...) That'd be great, except that the demands are not that simple. I really wish I new where to look for the lawsuits, I've heard about them on the news and from Christians, but I've never been able to read about them. (...) It is no longer that (...) (24 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |  | | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| I am finding that making so many individual replies is somewhat taxing. I seem to be saying too much in some posts, and not enough in others. Here, I should have distinctly referred to Christianity, rather than religion in general. Other religions (...) (24 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |  | | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Low writes: [snip] (...) Asked and answered ;-) (...) 'Cause then we'd be giving birth in winter, which wouldn't be real wise :-) Cheers Richie (24 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |  | | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| (...) Actually, simply acknowledging that something is beauiful would not be a sin, however, thinking, "...wow, what a bod, I just gotta have it..." is just as bad as actually "getting it". (...) (24 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |