|
|
 | | Re: Customs question...
|
| (...) (Honestly curious) So how would you categorize subsets of morality? I've basically attempted to come up with different ways in which to violate morality. The two most basic being "that's not fair" or "that's mean". One might also say "you (...) (24 years ago, 21-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Conspiracy theories
|
| Sometimes I find the strangest links in the strangest places... (URL) link was in someone's sig on a www.megatokyo.com discussion forum. I'm dubious at best about the veracity of this particular theory. (24 years ago, 21-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Customs question...
|
| (...) even (...) was (...) Well, your three categories of morality isn't my baby, and I'm not even sure I agree with it as morality-o-meter, but let's look at it this way: (...) You're defining justice as truth? I think it is fairness and/or equity. (...) (24 years ago, 21-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Customs question...
|
| (...) anyway, (...) Whether or not they know the declaration was untruthful, they have failed to pay duty on goods which require it by law. If you're importing goods, it's your responsibility to pay the appropriate duty (at least in Australia). The (...) (24 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Customs question...
|
| (...) Agreed I spose-- I was more or less implying my own morality for myself (or was trying), but yes, if you find it to be moral, yeah. However, the more I think about it, the less I can concieve of it being actual "moral", so much as "justified". (...) (24 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
