 | | Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
|
(...) I suppose if one defined it that way, sure. Perhaps it's my inexperience with outside newsgroups other than Lugnet, but I've more just seen it as a general (non-person-specific) goading into debate. Certainly the connotations associated with (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: One of my issues with the god of the old testament
|
|
(...) Forgive me if this comes across as trolling, but my understanding would benefit from a few points of clarification. Do you propose that morality is self-evident? I accept a priori your faith in God, but did God specifically create morality, or (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
|
(...) No, I don't think you'd ever notice the trend in any sort of public forum, because while it works, the most common reply to a flame is to flame back. I've kind of noticed that in o-t.debate-- a rather alarming number of the regulars quite (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
|
(...) All right then. Stipulating that "troll" can reasonably be used as a neutral term, then I'll agree that I was trolling. Generally I don't accept that definition, however; never have I seen "troll" used with a positive connotation, and it's (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: One of my issues with the god of the old testament
|
|
(...) Indeed. I do not posit Christianity as an unchanging Thing. I do assert, however, that Christianity claims to have some insights about the ultimate nature of reality, insofar as it concerns us. Science didn't change with Einstein's theories, (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
|
(...) And that would be incorrect in my understanding of the word "troll." troll (trol) verb 1. To post a message in a newsgroup or other online conference in the hopes that somebody else will consider the original message so outrageous that it (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
|
(...) Thanks for the tip. Haven't seen it work that way here, though. (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The Nam-shub of Enki (was Re: One of my issues with the god of the old testament)
|
|
(...) I read Stephenson's novel last year, and while I liked it, I don't think he ever gets any more interesting than his obvious sources: Sumerian mythology, and William Burroughs. And I guess I fault Stephenson, and many other Cyberpunk authors, (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
|
(...) Well, the thing that's wrong with that is the fact that there's nothing *but* connotation there. Being a "bonehead" is sufficiently without good definition, whereas a "troll" post has a definition as well as a connotation. If Jeremy only used (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | RE: trolling? (Was all that OT God stuff)
|
|
(...) I see your point, but if (hypothetically) I call someone a bonehead, there's nothing wrong with it either, except the connotation. If Jeremy was using "troll" to say "bravo to you for throwing down the rhetorical gauntlet and inviting (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
