To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *10977 (-5)
  Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
 
(...) Here: (URL) C. (24 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
 
(...) It's not that the example doesn't suit me, it's just that it's incomplete. I gave an example similar to your scenario of pricing above the prevalent retail and asked if it was fair or not under your definition. I think you need to give another (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
 
(...) Uh, what *did* you say about fascinating? -Shiri (24 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  A piece of U.S. history (was: Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda))
 
Whew! What a long post. I've been typing for almost an hour. So careful, great ramble ahead, and the footnotes are almost as long as the post itself. ;-) (...) Matt already found some stuff for you and all, I just wanted to say that I didn't really (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
 
(...) Sorry, should have said "announcing the laying off of tens of thousands of workers daily"...and I don't mean in total! Look at this from today's TechTV news: (URL) said it will take a $830 million restructuring charge, which is associated with (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR