 | | Re: Off-topic.clones: I wish TLG would have made this part!
|
|
(...) Actually, I've been reading the whole thread, Dave! Trust me on that, Dave! The fact that the parts were first used in a train creation doesn't mean they are train specific parts to a strict compartmentalist like myself, Dave! (...) Again, (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Off-topic.clones: I wish TLG would have made this part!
|
|
(...) Well obviously it's because I deleted the part that was relevant to trains before posting it. If you had bothered to read the part I didn't post, it would all be clear to you. My train-related question, since Tony's engrooved bricks first (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Off-topic.clones: I wish TLG would have made this part!
|
|
(...) I'm wondering why this leaked over into .trains... I would say that if there are only 2 bins, "official LEGO(r) parts", and "everything else" these parts belong in the "everything else" bin. But the better solution is a different bin (library) (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Off-topic.clones: I wish TLG would have made this part!
|
|
(...) I wonder--since these parts still have the official LEGO logo on the studs, would they even have a place in a clones DB? You've mentioned previously a possible library of dats based on user-modified elements; perhaps Tony's bricks would fit in (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Off-topic.clones: I wish TLG would have made this part!
|
|
(...) Hafner has already modelled them -- you should contact him about using them in the clone elements DB. -- Hop-Frog (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
