 | | Re: Cobi/Best-Lock
|
| (...) There may be another variable at play in those northern European cases; as far as I'm aware, LEGO maintains a de facto stranglehold on many of the markets there, so competitor brands are denied entry altogether. It seems that LEGO has secured (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Cobi/Best-Lock
|
| (...) It's a little misleading to say their arguments have 'failed' - the same arguments that got shot down in Mega Bloks' Canadian home court are still doing just fine in the courts of northern Europe. I think the big loss in Germany is going to be (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Cobi/Best-Lock
|
| (...) That's an interesting argument--do you have a citation? I ask because I believe that the patent on the minifig design has expired, and previous arguments by LEGO re: the "trademark" status of their pieces have failed. The majority of rulings (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Cobi/Best-Lock
|
| (...) It's about trademark rather than copyright - the minifig is legally recognized to represent the Lego company, it's not just one of their designs or intellectual properties. From a legal standpoint, using the minifig is equivalent to using the (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Cobi/Best-Lock
|
| (...) (URL) Here's> a shot of three minifigs from the Just Kidz line of Cobi/Best-Lock stuff. And (URL) here's> a reverse angle of the guy on the far left. As you'll see, the leg-holes are square, in what I think is an inferior design; it takes more (...) (19 years ago, 3-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
|
