|
|
 | | Re: A shot in the dark
|
| (...) I agree with most of what you have said, however I'm not certain your car analogy is valid. While cars can be a deadly weapon that is not what they are designd for. A well used gun is one that is never used whereas a well used car is used all (...) (18 years ago, 11-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: A shot in the dark
|
| (...) I will agree that the homeowner was wrong, but on different grounds. He did not properly identify his target before firing. In many states, you are allowed to presume that any un-invited intruder in your house is a deadly threat. Such laws are (...) (18 years ago, 11-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
|
| (...) It's not in that situation, either. It is noble and compassionate to try and comfort and help provide meaning to one in pain and agony. Further, not helping someone kill themselves can hardly be characterized as "forcing" them to live, Dave! (...) (18 years ago, 11-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
|
| (...) You're correct, but that's kind of a dumb law. There's a ton of things that you can do to yourself that you can't do to others without consent, among which tattooing and masturbation are perhaps two of the most obvious examples. Why suicide (...) (18 years ago, 11-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
|
| (...) I don't know that it's as simple as a black-and-white declaration. If someone is at full mental faculty but is physically incapacitated by constant agony with no hope of relief, how is it noble and compassionate to force that person to (...) (18 years ago, 11-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
