|
|
 | | Re: peeron inventory
|
| (...) --snip-- (...) John, It was not polite to make the comment "Corrections sent to inv@peeron again are not getting posted. It has been a bit since they did a few.". The reason it isn't polite is because it is a) unneccesary and b) expectant as (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: peeron inventory
|
| (...) Tim: I was not rude to volunteers, I even offered to volunteer to get thing done. I want to help and have only come here when Dan ignored my requests as to what was happening to the corrections sent into Peeron.com. I am still not sure what (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: peeron inventory
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Patterson wrote: --snip-- (...) John, You're really beginning to make me very irritated. You seem unable to accept responsibility for the way you put things and seem to justify this in a variety of ways including (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: peeron inventory
|
| (...) For a guy who's thick-skinned, you sure when to a lot of trouble to prove it. (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: peeron inventory
|
| (...) Thanks Dave: Thanks Dave: I treat others well. If anything is rude it is the people that take apart every comment I make, which I really do not give a hoot about. The inventories are messed up; I am trying to fix that. Almost every one I look (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
