 | | Re: Two questions for the Conservatives and/or Republicans out there
|
|
(...) Of course you're not guaranteed, but you could do some 50/50 chance stuff. Imagine if one candidate is ahead in the polls with 75% of the vote (Sven), compared to another candidate with 25% (Twiggy). It could be argued that Twiggy has no (...) (20 years ago, 9-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Two questions for the Conservatives and/or Republicans out there
|
|
(...) That only assumes that the machine can't rig it during the individual vote. Once the votes are cast and the moderator goes to the machine, how do we verify that Candidate A really got 7,500 votes and Candidate B really got 2,500? (...) Oh, I (...) (20 years ago, 9-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Two questions for the Conservatives and/or Republicans out there
|
|
(...) Why not, Dave!? There can't be cheating if the machines could be rigged so that it doesn't know which candidates are under which button (if that is your concern). It would be like a double-blind study. Surely you aren't implying that the (...) (20 years ago, 9-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Two questions for the Conservatives and/or Republicans out there
|
|
Do you trust Diebold's touchscreen-based voting machines to record an accurate tally of votes? Why? Dave! (20 years ago, 9-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Testing
|
|
Testing. Do not read. (20 years ago, 3-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
