 | | Re: Don't have to about LEGO to be geeky...
|
|
(...) I want to meet the guy in the propellor beanie. Anyone ever build one of those (partly) out of you know what? (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Don't have to about LEGO to be geeky...
|
|
(...) :-( Not *everyone*... sadly, PLUG was late in its formation, and the url we wanted had alread been taken by the Portuguese LINUX Users Group. Too bad for us :-/ Pedro (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Pro Builder Space Shuttle at TRU (exclusive)
|
|
(...) How are the cargo bay doors attached? And could you possibly post a scan of one of the door elements? Thanks for the info--none of my local TRU's have it yet. Did you get yours via Amazon or directly from a store? Dave! (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Don't have to about LEGO to be geeky...
|
|
(...) approached by the local group of Richmond Linuxians* who would like us to give it up to them. Like heck we will. EVERYONE knows that a LUG is a LEGO Users Group. Duh! Greg *I'm sure they look remarkably similiar to the NY group. (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.org.us.richlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Don't have to about LEGO to be geeky...
|
|
(...) Wow, at first glance I thought that was an orangutan wearing a propeller hat sitting behind a young Bill Gates. -Rob. (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Don't have to about LEGO to be geeky...
|
|
I guess any group with LUG in the title is full of "geeks", just doesn't have to be about LEGO. (URL) (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Re: debate fodder from an unusual source...
|
|
(...) I would imagine that both are related to the level the economy is operating at. (...) I'm not sure "Railroads" have been nationalised in the UK(?) - I exepct Tony has went the "3rd Way". (...) However you look at that mess, it is not an (...) (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: debate fodder from an unusual source...
|
|
(...) What are the other criteria used to determine/justify these "natural monopolies?" (...) My coworker has a power line running to his house that he occasionally uses during peak use times on the weekend, but primarily generates his own power. If (...) (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: debate fodder from an unusual source...
|
|
(...) *some* economists do. Others reject the notion of a natural monopoly. The classic example is the (...) Just as a side note, I've said in the past that I didn't buy the natural monopoly argument, and have argued in detail against specific (...) (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: how to make points?
|
|
(...) Since that would mean that my wife has standing to comment (at about 1/8 Native American) but I (at pretty much all European) don't... I would tend to hold it as not reasonable. Else she'll hold it against ME! (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
